People can’t handle Criticism

I made a post called My thoughts on Internet Wars. One of the key elements over it was this line: People would said this person can’t handle Criticism My response toward it was the person can take Criticism just your so called Criticism more about putting then down. The honest truth in many ways. There always nice way and mean, hatefully way of things. I would rather want hear comments that are helpful, nice, kind rather then Critical, Insulting, other-things like that. People have feelings and time to time people forget feelings exist in the first place over what saying. Does anything need be perfect?.

 

Artist Reminding over Fiction Characters 3

I founded a Tumblr Account that is about Pokemon Porn. Having this disclaimer: ALL GIRLS POSTED HERE ARE 18+, I DO NOT CONDONE POSTING OF MINORS OR ANYTHING RELATED TO UNDERAGE GIRLS.

Under the disclaimer there is article saying those words: My Original Blog It was banned because I was told the images I posted pertained to child pornography. I didn’t know, and I won’t do it here. That blog had over 3.2k followers, the biggest fanbase I ever had (My first blog has 8 still) and I miss it deeply, lets honor it with this blog.

Here is my reaction:

When I see Pokemon Porn, other forms of Fiction Porn. I take it as Fiction Content and having no rules and laws in any sharp or form. Why can’t Tumblr, other websites, people be like this: Real images of videos depicting illegal activities is not allow.

Rather be like this Imagination is Evil.

YouTube Unfair Rule and Law

YouTube.com rules and laws are the following:

First Rule: Sexually explicit content like pornography is not allowed. There is more of this basically anything Porn-graph. You know the irony YouTube has those two things:

A) Age-restricted content In cases where videos do not cross the line but still contain sexual content, we may apply an age restriction so that only viewers over a certain age can view the content.

B) Restricted Mode location at the bottom YouTube Pages. Saying the following: Restricted Mode hides videos that may contain inappropriate content flagged by users and other signals. No filter is 100% accurate, but it should help you avoid most inappropriate content. Your Restricted Mode setting will apply to this browser only.

When the website already has two ways that are classified as Filter/Parent Control. Makes me have this reaction:

Here is a link to YouTube Rules and Laws: support.google.com/youtube/ans…

As bonus we are talking about this from YouTube: Join in and have fun. Remember that this is your community. Each and every person on YouTube makes the site what it is, so don’t be afraid to dig in and get involved. There’s a lot to see here, with lots of folks creating amazing stuff—one of them might be you! Equipment is getting cheaper and easier to use all the time, so dive in and enjoy.

Unit this company:

Does this again:

For the thousand time, companies, famous people. Here is what Companies, famous People toward YouTube:

Companies and Famous People I smell: Using other people content. Trying share enjoyment to the Internet and making a living over it. Let folks know what you think. Feedback is part of the experience, and when done with respect, it can be a great way to make friends, share stories, and make your time on YouTube richer. So leave comments, rate videos, make your own responses to videos that affect you, enter contests of interest—there’s a lot going on and a lot of ways to participate.

That is something like and love about YouTube show off and share off my thoughts over things, etc. But most of all, have fun with the site! We hope you’ll find something new to love as you get to know the community.

Comment on I don’t have Learning Disabilities at all

Someone made a comment on my post called I don’t have Learning Disability at all. The comment was the following: did you take them at a psychologist’s office or online?

My answer toward the question: Online

The person response toward my answer was the following: Don’t trust online tests.In-fact I took Quizzes from the following websites 

A) Psych-Central run by ordinary mental health professionals — not a group of business people, sales guys, or investors looking to make a quick return on their money. That’s on purpose — that way you know the information we’re providing is there because of our expertise.

I took a quiz on the website over (Autism/Asperger’s). Here is my results and info about my score: 

(Autism/Asperger’s Quiz) 10% from Psy-central 

With the words: You have answered this autism screening in such a way as to suggest that you are not likely currently suffering from an autism spectrum disorder, including Asperger’s disorder. 

B) Additudemag with those words: Over the years, your roles have changed. You are less like lovers than like a scolding parent and a naughty child. When your husband doesn’t do something you ask him to do, you do it yourself.” This is no way to live. What to do instead. 

The Quiz I took was: (Does My Child Have a Learning Disability? Take This Screening Quiz.

Note: It’s the only Quiz I could found around Learning Disabilities. Under the quiz said the following: National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities

My results are the following: 

Your Score: 0% 

Your elementary school child does not seem to have any of the signs and symptoms that should prompt an evaluation for a learning disability.

C) Psychology Today. A website that gathered a group of renowned psychologists, academics, psychiatrists and writers to contribute their thoughts and ideas on what makes us tick. We’re a live stream of what’s happening in ‘psychology today’.

The Quiz I took was: Mental Health Assessment, Has a reference of American Psychiatric Association

My results are the following: Based on your responses, there is little to no indication of mental disorders.

Just because I took online Quizzes does not mean can’t be telling the truth about me. Over the three websites I founded. I took Quizzes from people who understand mental disorders and Mental Disabilities . I have always had the feeling I was misdiagnosed with having Learning Disabilities, Autism, Mental Disorders. I previously talked about having.

Video Game Mods classified as Piracy V2

I found-out a mod for the Simpsons Hit & Run for the PC was remove off the website called: mediafire.com.

The company who got the mod removed is called: DctecNet. Fighting against Piracy over having there email address as this: antipiracy@dtecnet.com

 

The Define of Video Game Mods is this: A mod, or modification, is the alteration of content from a video game in order to make it operate in a manner different from its original version. Mods can be created for any genre of game but are especially popular in first-person shooters, role-playing games and real-time strategy games.

Video Games Mods Almost like using the resources from the video game creators themselves. Almost like turning this:

Into this:

Video Game Companies don’t mind this. In-Fact Bethesda Studios made Fallout 4 Mod Friendly on Consoles. I don’t see Bethesda Studios doing this toward Mod Author:

You are a Internet Pirate, I’m coming for you. This company looking this definition of Piracy:

1) The unauthorized use or reproduction of another’s work.

Video Game Mods, Emulators in my opinion fall under the category: Preserving Gaming History. no harm toward the video game companies.

Video Game Mods almost like Free DLC made by the Fandom themselves. The website MediaFire on the page has those lines: Still have questions, or think we’ve made a mistake?.

You sure did make a huge mistake over removing-this.

Deviantart Unfair Rule and Law

I founded a rule and law gives out this reaction:

The rule is the following:

Note: There is more about this rule and law. Basically, this one got my attention the most. Summer up the other rules and laws. Over Fiction is the same as real-life.

1) Prohibiting the depiction of minors engaged in sexual conduct. I know what you are thinking. Only comes into play over real-life content. The rule also comes into play over Fiction Content. Because we know this:

Is this:

Overseeing people content removed, censored, links to another website, move to another website, banned, other-things. As someone said: “Not allow drawings of characters in sexual situations based on characters minors (even drawn into an adult version). More if talking about fictional characters! they do not exist! They are not going to offend because they have never existed!.It’s the ideas:  That policy exists because humans have made lots of laws around the world (and in particular about pictures and stories showing sex with humans. Without the humans, there are far fewer problems for us.

Everyone needs understand Fiction and Real Life is not the same-thing. As I said in a blog: I fully understand those reasons for real-life Human content. But if its Fiction Human Content in my mind completely madness. Force the same rules if the content is real-life. If I controlled Deviantart would make content Filter over Fiction content and focus on the real-life. I love the website but just like others. Acceptances and goes on with the madness.

As I said why it’s that E621.net the only one as this: Real images of videos depicting illegal activities is not allowed.

Does not have the ideas: Can’t properly discern what’s okay in Fantasy from what’s okay in reality. Because they can’t discern what’s okay in real life from what’s okay in fiction.

Censor non Conventional Sex Acts Online Internet Pornography

I found-out Uk trying to censor videos of non-conventional sex acts. This including’s stuff like: Pictures and videos that show spanking, whipping or caning that leaves marks, and sex acts involving urination, female ejaculation or menstruation as well as sex in public are likely to be caught by the ban.

Here is the details about UK Insanity right-now: Campaniers label bill targeted at online pornography a ‘prurient’ intervention that will take Britain’s censorship regime back to pre-internet era

The proposal would force internet service providers to block sites hosting content that would not be certified for commercial DVD sale by the British Board of Film Classification.

Keep in mind: British Board of Film Classification in-fact Haters of this:

Base over the ideas hearing from YouTuber called: Phillip DeFranco talking about British Board of Film Classification in past, present, future covering Fiction and Non Content. Because we know free your Imagination against the law:

I was almost arrested liking violence video games. Hear more about UK Insanity again. Web users in the UK will be banned from accessing websites portraying a range of non-conventional sexual acts, under a little discussed clause to a government bill currently going through parliament.

The proposal, part of the digital economy bill, would force internet service providers to block sites hosting content that would not be certified for commercial DVD sale by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC).

It is contained within provisions of the bill designed to enforce strict age verification checks to stop children accessing adult websites. After pressure from MPs, the culture secretary, Karen Bradley, announced on Saturday that the government would amend the bill to include powers to block non-compliant websites.

In order to comply with the censorship rules, many mainstream adult websites would have to render whole sections inaccessible to UK audiences. That is despite the acts shown being legal for consenting over-16s to perform and for adults in almost all other liberal countries to film, distribute and watch.

Restricting niche porn sites is a disaster for people with marginalised sexualities

Pandora Blake

Free speech campaigners labelled the move a “prurient” invasion into people’s sexual lives. “It should not be the business of government to regulate what kinds of consensual adult sex can be viewed by adults,” said Jodie Ginsberg, chief executive of Index on Censorship.

The scale of the restrictions only became apparent after the BBFC, which has since 1984 been empowered to classify videos for commercial hire or sale, agreed to become the online age verification regulator last month. A spokeswoman for the BBFC said it would also check whether sites host “pornographic content that we would refuse to classify”.

“In making this assessment, we will apply the standards that we apply to pornography that is distributed offline,” she said. “If a website fails on either of these [age verification or obscene content] tests then a notification of non-compliance will be sent to the site.”

There is no definitive list of sexual acts proscribed by the BBFC, but many adult film producers who have worked with the regulator have been forced to cut scenes, said Jerry Barnett, a free speech campaigner and author of Porn Panic!, which details the rise of a new pro-censorship movement in the UK.

“Although it is nominally designed to enforce the [Obscene Publications Act] guidelines of the Crown Prosecution Service, in practice it draws far tighter lines, many of them inexplicable. The ban on female ejaculation is a particularly strange example,” he said.

The censorship regime has led to bizarre understandings between the producers and regulators, Barnett said. One is the “four-finger rule”, which limits the number of digits that can be inserted into an orifice for sexual stimulation.

Even some who back age verification questioned such strict censorship. “It’s mad that we regulate such material that aren’t even criminal acts,” said Prof Clare McGlynn, an expert on pornography laws at Durham University and co-founder of the Centre for Gender Equal Media.

“If we are regulating things like menstrual blood or urination, that’s detracting from a focus on what I think is really the harmful material, and that would be material around child sexual abuse, but also around sexual violence,” she added.

Advertisement

There has been no discussion of the censorship provisions of the digital economy bill by MPs during its committee stage, where debate has largely focused on age verification rules. But sources within the adult industry seemed aware.

A spokeswoman for MindGeek, one of the world’s biggest pornographic website operators, said the company expected that structures would be created to “maintain the rights of adults to view adult content”. She said it was too early to say whether the same CPS guidance would be in place for the Obscene Publications Act by the time the bill becomes law.

“Many of the sexual activities prohibited from R18 [the BBFC’s most explicit certification] are normalised and accepted aspects of healthy sexuality, and are proudly celebrated by the feminist, queer and ethical porn movements internationally,” she said.

Neither the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, which drafted the bill, nor the BBFC would comment on suggestions that censorship could be relaxed. A spokesman for DCMS said the government’s aim is to ensure that the same “rules and safeguards” that exist in the physical world also apply online.

“DCMS has recently indicated that it intends to designate the BBFC as regulator and is considering the most effective way to implement these measures,” he added.

Here is my thoughts:

Just like Fair-Use it’s this:

Fiction and real-life content. What the heck with British Board of Film Classification. Better ideas rather ruin it for everyone. In-fact hurting or killing anyone. My parents about violence video games were like this. Wait unit your older, content Filters. My parents did not write to Canadian prime minister making a law that ruins the internet like-this.

British Board of Film Classification more like supports Haters of Freedom Expression/Fiction. I hear about the same-thing about Germany, other countries. Rather them allowing people make up there mind. Think up ideas-es about cersordship. I never knew Grand Thief Auto kills people. I’m hoping the UK people do not turn this ideas-es into a real thing. I dislike 1984 because British Board of Film Classification become a cersordship Monster. Content Filters and Parent Controls better them making Real Life and Internet Rules and Laws.

What next going banned

Because picture of a female ejaculation that is Fiction picture. Sex is something should not be control like this. Less with Piracy Companies go after the real deal. Don’t banned this episode of the Simpsons: “Steal This Episode talking about Piracy, Homer Simpson doing Piracy in-it, making a good case why Homer Simpson was doing it in the first place.

Christmas Evil (1980)

I don’t have Learning Disabilities After-All

I made two posts talking about the topic of having Learning Disabilities. The names of the two posts are the following: Learning Disability, I feel like a normal person by myself. I took some quizzes a few days I’m Mental Disorder Free, Learning Disability Free, Autism Free.

Obsession over Hating someone

I made up the name for this Post over reading someone comment, other people reply’s. Every that talking about someone. I though about making more focusing anyone who can relate this. Having or dealing with Haters or what call people waste there time not being successful.

The comment is the following: Why people still dislike videos?. People still think it’s some le funneh may-maybe to do it?.

Here is the responses from other people:

1) They are just haters plain and simple

My reply: Pretty much

2) He’s the definition of Scum:

The user he is talking about. Makes videos about video games. How in the heck making videos about video games makes you the definition of Scum. You can use the same logic around everyone who is a gamer. The irony about it.

3) I understand why they hate the user but what I don’t understand is why they stick around his channel waiting for new videos to upload just so they can dislike them. They seem to have some sort of a hate obsession with the person.

My reaction:

That is the saddest thing I ever hear in my life. Wait around just dislike someone videos. Being jealousy of there successful. Not working on there own YouTube Channel. There is a reason why not success in the first place.

4) Same reason people like his videos the instant they go up not for hate. Some people think can do no wrong ever while others think he always does something wrong without ever watching videos.

My reply: Basically some people are focusing on the User non perfectionist about himself. Other people honestly don’t care about it.

5) I get what you’re saying expect with this user it’s different. From what I seen so far, the user is the only youtuber that has hate groups. You know people who dedicate their time to solely hate on him and make THYDP videos because they feel that the user deserves it. He even has people on twitter that tweet about him every day pointing out his flaws and watching his every move. I have yet to see this same obsessive behavior with other youtubers. Sounds like those people role model is Frank Grimes from The Simpsons:

Frank Grimes from The Simpsons episode called Homer’s Enemy. Frank was always focusing on Homer Simpson flaws, being mean/hatefully, insulting, other things toward Homer Simpson. Homer did nothing wrong just being himself, Homer Simpson wanted friendship rather then a enemy. This sounds like the hate group are the same-ideas. Rather then focusing on there own content. Love the ideas of insulting, putting others down, etc.

6) That’s not entirely true, he does have close friends that he greatly appreciates on here and on twitter. I just think for everyone else he has a fancy way of showing his love for his fans even though it may not seem that way. He also has an anger issue that he needs to work on that affects the way some of his former fans and current fans look at him. There are worst people out there you know.

My reply: I understand everyone has flaws. Try accept there pros and cons. Other people should do as well.

7) Spot on man The user isn’t even a big youtuber but has hate groups its weird. There is a way reason said those words:
–
8)  It seems all gaming youtubers have their hate groups. It must be a new fad.

My reply: Video Game Creators are the real fans. The Gamers by doing this are acting like in-mature children. Time to time Video Game Creators join the fun.

9)  Dude you haven’t RTU’s haters. Another user actually was threaten with a dox by a group known. This user is not the only one. These people are fucked up.

Those type of person don’t deserve the Internet.

10) Yea I guess Youtubers aren’t safe from anybody. There’s always that one extreme group that does some excessive crazy shit.

My reply: This why YouTube.com should actually enforce there rules and laws stopping extreme groups.

11)  It seems everyone has a group a detractors. I swear you are treated like the devil some the on the internet if you make money on youtube.

My reply: Greedy is not evil. Making Money is. The same ideas eating food.

12) The Users blockes haters out like a fly on the wall so he stays strong haters are people who just use words to get under your skin even tho they should know words are just noises we make and you only get offended if you let your self.

My reply: I agree with that.

By reading this comment, responses toward the comment. I can said YouTube, and the internet general allows people don’t deserve the internet exist. End this post Haters deserve be non successful over wasting time on this. The person that they hate deserves more successful over focusing on there own-work.