I found someone Inkbunny Journal-Entry talking about this:
Step 1: getting triggered by stuff you don’t like
Step 2: post a journal to your whiteknights because wew I’m a popufur and everyone will support me
Step 3:
“eww cub! Ban it it’s pedophilia”
“But furfaggotery is not zoophilia!”
“but drawings of rape aren’t rape, is not real”
Conclusion: It’s not FA, the staff of FN are not favoritist cunts like Cuckoneer and his bitches.
Insert triggered meme
The cycle goes and goes
Here is the Comments from Inkbunny Journal-Entries
1) I literally just closed the tab myself from reading that discussion….Mostly because someone was saying that people can use cub porn images to convince real life kids what they’re doing to them is okay, I’m so done with reading it I swear
Also, just pointing out, Neer didn’t get rid of cub because of people whining, he got rid of it because of legal reasons, Neer likes cub as well, or liked if it comes to that case.
Author Comments: Ohh I saw that one and it cracked me up. I know about the Pay donator thing was what caused it. But anyways that’s pretty much what he does, listens the popufurs because wew they made the site earn money remember the bitch of his exwife only used him to be admin and then left him for another one who earns more money for being part of the bronycon staff.
2) She is right. FA is based in the United States. FA faced being shut down and losing all its advertising sources at the time if they did not adhere to the law of no cub art which under US law classifies it as child porn even if its not of rl children. We almost lost pokemon art to this rule as well because its a kid show. Thankfully they wised up on that decision. I see FN bowing down to these people. Because I believe FN is based in the US as well. I am not 100% certain though.
3) you know that 2D loli and shota , so also cub is just fine under US law ? :O
4) I was unaware of this. But I also have those keywords blacklisted here on IB. A feature many should use instead of bitching about whats on the site. Shota and Loli is not my thing despite liking cub art. Maybe should make polls to remove stuff that disgusts me. Oh wait, I’m not a jackass like those people are x3
5) That article cites the CPPA being struck down in 2002. Since that time another act (2003 PROTECT) has rewritten the laws. the 1995 and 2002 rulings are not clear precedent anymore.
Since that time there are at least 4 documented cases with people receiving sentences.
However, I would say that its a little more uncertain on further reading but there’s definitely some danger of any one collection being illegal. Cubs and nonhumans might be further away but I don’t see any tests on that ground.
6) your cases of people have actual child porn
but we are talking about cartoons lol
7) Some of them just have cartoons; did you even read the instances?
Though it doesn’t fully matter if they did or did not have CP. As long as they got convicted for the cartoons under a separate charge it still counts as precedent. Read the “2012 Missouri case” and the “2008 Iowa case”
8) What are you up to? owo I read your cases and these people have actual child porn and that is the reason, why they received sentence. Don’t irritate me. Cub porn is perfectly fine in the US.
9) U.S. Law source please?
10) maybe you want to search it yourself I’m not from amerika
11) have. I keep getting redirected to the COPPA laws x3.
SJW give me this face: